Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40665090›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2025

Regulating the Midwife: Power, Public Health, and the Decline of Traditional Midwifery in West Virginia, 1881-1929.

Timothy De Ver Dye

Abstract readHistorical Article
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Timothy De Ver DyeUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA. tim_dye@urmc.rochester.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9801-4712

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This historical policy analysis centers on how early maternal and child health (MCH) efforts affected the practice and decline of traditional midwifery in West Virginia. From the emergence of official government action in MCH with the establishment of the West Virginia Board of Health in 1881, through the federal Sheppard-Towner Maternity and Infancy Act of the 1920s-the nation's first large-scale attempt at making the provision and improvement of MCH issues a national priority-West Virginia transformed childbirth practices by increasingly regulating, professionalizing, and ultimately marginalizing traditional midwives. As the West Virginia case shows, the intersection of state and federal public policy and professional power attempted to improve maternal and infant outcomes, which often led to policies reducing autonomy and numbers of midwives. The West Virginia experience reflects wider US trends in the early twentieth century, showing that public health programs and physician-led campaigns combined to reform who was authorized to attend births. West Virginia's history exemplifies the dual nature of MCH legislation in the early 1900s, bringing much-needed resources and attention to maternal and infant health, but accelerating the decline of midwifery through regulatory oversight and the medicalization of birth, frequently leaving communities without skilled expertise in pregnancy-related care.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesMidwiferyPublic HealthFemaleHealth PolicyHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHumansPregnancyWest VirginiaAppalachiaCommunityHistoryLegislationMaternal and child healthMidwiferyMidwivesObstetricsPolitical ecologyPregnancyPrenatal carePublic healthSheppard-TownerWest Virginia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.