Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40665087›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning approaches for forecasting compressive strength of high-strength concrete.

Mohammed Shaaban, Mohamed Amin, S Selim, Islam M Riad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammed ShaabanCivil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Delta University for Science and Technology, International Coastal Road, Gamasa, Egypt. Mohamed.selim@deltauniv.edu.eg.
Mohamed AminCivil and Architectural Constructions Department, Faculty of Technology and Education, Suez University, Suez, Egypt.
S SelimStructural Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Islam M RiadCivil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Delta University for Science and Technology, International Coastal Road, Gamasa, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying the mechanical properties of High Strength Concrete (HSC), particularly compressive strength, is critical for safety purposes. Concrete compressive strength is determined by using laboratory experiments, which are costly and time-consuming. Artificial intelligence (AI) methods reduce time and money. This research proposes a machine learning (ML) model using the Python programming language to predict the compressive strength of HSC. The dataset used for the models was obtained from original experimental tests. Important parameters, namely cement content, silica fume, water, superplasticizer, sand, gravel, and curing age, were taken as input to predict the output, which was the compressive strength. Various regression models were investigated for the prediction of outcome compressive strength. To optimize the models, hyperparameters were tuned, and measures such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Squared Error (MSE), and R-squared were used for evaluation. XGBoost (R

Indexed as

High strength concreteMachine learningPrediction modelsPython

Identifiers

PMID40665087
PMCPMC12264175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.