Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40665042›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2025

Postoperative complication severity prediction in penile prosthesis implantation: a machine learning-based predictive modeling study.

Ali Ünal, Ali Şahin, Mesut Altan, İhsan Batuhan Demir, İyimser Üre, Hazım Alparslan Mazlum, Lorenzo Cirigliano, Mirko Preto, Marco Falcone, Murat Gül

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of impotence research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ali ÜnalDepartment of Urology, Oltu State Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2966-7987
Ali ŞahinDepartment of Emergency Service, Dr. Vefa Tanır Ilgın State Hospital, Konya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3139-8205
Mesut AltanDepartment of Urology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8884-9954
İhsan Batuhan DemirDepartment of Urology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
İyimser ÜreDepartment of Urology, Eskişehir Osmangazi University School of Medicine, Eskişehir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4653-576X
Hazım Alparslan MazlumDepartment of Urology, Eskişehir Osmangazi University School of Medicine, Eskişehir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9418-1194
Lorenzo CiriglianoDepartment of Urology, Molinette Hospital, University of Torino, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8732-4272
Mirko PretoDepartment of Urology, Molinette Hospital, University of Torino, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8144-6498
Marco FalconeDepartment of Urology, Molinette Hospital, University of Torino, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1101-892X
Murat GülDepartment of Urology, Selçuk University School of Medicine, Konya, Turkey. drmuratgul@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6657-6227

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prediction of postoperative complications is crucial in surgical care, particularly for penile prosthesis implantation. We retrospectively evaluated demographic, clinical, laboratory, and surgical data from patients who underwent penile prosthesis implantation between 2015 and 2023. Six machine learning algorithms-Gradient Boosting (GB), AdaBoost, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), XGBoost (XGB), and Naive Bayes (NB)-were trained to predict the occurrence and severity of postoperative complications. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, F1 score, sensitivity, specificity, Youden Index, and AUC value, and statistical comparisons identified the most effective approach. The GB model achieved the highest F1 score (0.86 ± 0.09; 95% CI, 0.84-0.87), significantly outperforming other models. Sensitivity was greatest for GB and XGB (0.78 ± 0.13; 95% CI, 0.75-0.80), with GB superior to AdaBoost and SVM (p < 0.001). RF demonstrated the highest specificity (1.00 ± 0.00; 95% CI, 1.00-1.00), exceeding AdaBoost, SVM, and NB (p < 0.001). GB best predicted mild complications (0.74 ± 0.14; 95% CI, 0.72-0.77), while NB excelled for severe complications (0.94 ± 0.17; 95% CI, 0.90-0.98). Overall accuracy was 0.90 ± 0.04 (95% CI, 0.89-0.90) for both GB and RF. Feature analysis highlighted HbA1c, total testosterone, and urea as key predictors. Implementing GB-based machine learning may enhance surgical decision-making in this setting.

Identifiers

PMID40665042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.