SynthesisJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2025
Prognostic Significance of Circulating Tumor DNA Mutations in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Based on Time-To-Event Data.
Synthesis in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms of the digestive tract, most commonly originating in the stomach or small intestine, and driven by activating mutations in the KIT or PDGFRA genes. Liquid biopsy has emerged as a promising, minimally invasive technique to detect and monitor circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), offering real-time insights into tumor dynamics and treatment response. Specifically, detecting KIT/PDGFRA mutations in ctDNA may aid in assessing prognosis, therapeutic response, and resistance. However, the clinical utility of this approach remains unclear. To address this, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic relevance of ctDNA mutations in GIST patients by comparing survival outcomes between those with KIT/PDGFRA mutations and those with wild-type profiles or no detectable ctDNA.
methodsA comprehensive systematic search was performed in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify studies evaluating overall survival (OS) at different time points in patients with GIST, stratified by ctDNA status (ctDNA-negative vs. ctDNA-positive). Hazard ratios (HRs) were extracted or calculated, and Kaplan-Meier curves were reconstructed using an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using RStudio software, version 4.2.3.
resultsThis study included seven eligible studies comprising a total of 2024 histologically confirmed GIST patients, of whom 1610 were classified as ctDNA-positive and 414 had no detectable ctDNA mutations. OS at different time points was consistently more favorable in the ctDNA-negative group compared to the ctDNA-positive group (reference). The pooled hazard ratios (HR) were as follows: at 1year, HR 0.91 (95% CI: 0.89-0.93; p < 0.01; I
conclusionThis meta-analysis highlights the potential of ctDNA as a prognostic biomarker in GIST, showing that its presence is consistently associated with poorer survival outcomes across mutational subtypes. These findings support the integration of ctDNA analysis into clinical practice as a minimally invasive tool for disease monitoring, contributing to more personalized and precise management of GIST patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40665034What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.