Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40665034›Full record

SynthesisJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2025

Prognostic Significance of Circulating Tumor DNA Mutations in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Based on Time-To-Event Data.

Gustavo Tadeu Freitas Uchôa Matheus, Danilo Monteiro Ribeiro, Ana Luiza Rocha Soares Menegat, Brenda Luana Rocha Soares Menegat, Isabela Junger Meirelles Aguiar, Pedro Henrique de Souza Wagner, Rommel Mario Rodríguez Burbano, Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gustavo Tadeu Freitas Uchôa MatheusFederal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, 38025440, Brazil. gustadeu25@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-8707-4823
Danilo Monteiro RibeiroAnhembi Morumbi University, Piracicaba, São Paulo, 13425380, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7032-8167
Ana Luiza Rocha Soares MenegatCaxias Do Sul University, Rio Grande Do Sul, Caxias Do Sul, 95070560, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9126-0821
Brenda Luana Rocha Soares MenegatCaxias Do Sul University, Rio Grande Do Sul, Caxias Do Sul, 95070560, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-5703-1687
Isabela Junger Meirelles AguiarAnhembi Morumbi University, Piracicaba, São Paulo, 13425380, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-2008-2777
Pedro Henrique de Souza WagnerFederal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 88035972, Santa Catarina, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4511-4801
Rommel Mario Rodríguez BurbanoOphir Loyola Hospital, Belém, 66063240, Pará, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4872-234X
Francisco Cezar Aquino de MoraesFederal University of Pará, Belem, Pará, 66073005, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0623-8135

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms of the digestive tract, most commonly originating in the stomach or small intestine, and driven by activating mutations in the KIT or PDGFRA genes. Liquid biopsy has emerged as a promising, minimally invasive technique to detect and monitor circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), offering real-time insights into tumor dynamics and treatment response. Specifically, detecting KIT/PDGFRA mutations in ctDNA may aid in assessing prognosis, therapeutic response, and resistance. However, the clinical utility of this approach remains unclear. To address this, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic relevance of ctDNA mutations in GIST patients by comparing survival outcomes between those with KIT/PDGFRA mutations and those with wild-type profiles or no detectable ctDNA.

methodsA comprehensive systematic search was performed in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify studies evaluating overall survival (OS) at different time points in patients with GIST, stratified by ctDNA status (ctDNA-negative vs. ctDNA-positive). Hazard ratios (HRs) were extracted or calculated, and Kaplan-Meier curves were reconstructed using an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using RStudio software, version 4.2.3.

resultsThis study included seven eligible studies comprising a total of 2024 histologically confirmed GIST patients, of whom 1610 were classified as ctDNA-positive and 414 had no detectable ctDNA mutations. OS at different time points was consistently more favorable in the ctDNA-negative group compared to the ctDNA-positive group (reference). The pooled hazard ratios (HR) were as follows: at 1year, HR 0.91 (95% CI: 0.89-0.93; p < 0.01; I

conclusionThis meta-analysis highlights the potential of ctDNA as a prognostic biomarker in GIST, showing that its presence is consistently associated with poorer survival outcomes across mutational subtypes. These findings support the integration of ctDNA analysis into clinical practice as a minimally invasive tool for disease monitoring, contributing to more personalized and precise management of GIST patients.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAGastrointestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansLiquid BiopsyMutationPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alphaBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAKIT protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alphaCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA)Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)Liquid biopsyPrognostic biomarkers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.