Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40665000›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2025

Longitudinal evaluation of serum neurofilament light levels in normal healthy volunteers: defining a threshold of concern.

Thomas A Lanz, Klemens Ruprecht, Christopher J Somps, Jens C Göpfert, Tony Kam-Thong, Fetene Tekle, Kelly A Fader, Viviana A Carcamo Yañez, Volker Meyer, Sabine Friedrich and 5 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Thomas A LanzPfizer Inc., Drug Safety R&D, Groton, CT, USA. Thomas.a.lanz@pfizer.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2483-3122
Klemens RuprechtDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christopher J SompsPfizer Inc., Drug Safety R&D, Groton, CT, USA.
Jens C GöpfertNMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany.
Tony Kam-ThongRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Data and Analytics, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Fetene TekleJohnson & Johnson, Innovative Medicine R&D, Beerse, Belgium.
Kelly A FaderPfizer Inc., Translational Clinical Sciences, Groton, CT, USA.
Viviana A Carcamo YañezNMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany.
Volker MeyerABX-CRO Advanced Pharmaceutical Services, Dresden, Germany.
Sabine FriedrichABX-CRO Advanced Pharmaceutical Services, Dresden, Germany.
Katerina VlasakovaMerck & Co., Inc., Nonclinical Drug Safety, Rahway, NJ, USA.
Carolin OttoDepartment of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sara A PacigaPfizer Inc., Translational Clinical Sciences, Groton, CT, USA.
Sophia L SamodelovDept of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Shashi K RamaiahPfizer Inc., Drug Safety R&D, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

Innovative Medicines Initiative 821283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurofilament light (NfL) is a neuron-specific protein integral to neuronal cytoskeletons. Upon damage to the central or peripheral nervous system (NS), NfL is released into cerebrospinal fluid and blood. Elevated serum or plasma NfL levels have been reported in a variety of diseases and NS injury states. However, although intraindividual longitudinal NfL changes may be more meaningful than NfL measurements at a single timepoint, data on the longitudinal variation of NfL in normal healthy volunteers (NHV) are scarce. We investigated normal variation in NHV serum NfL and estimate an upper limit of normal (ULN) of NfL variation in longitudinal samples. An initial cross-sectional screening in sera from 270 NHV using a 4-plex assay detected NfL in 99.6% and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in 100%, while Tau (67.4%), and Ubiquitin Carboxyl-Terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1, 4.1%) were less frequently detectable. An age-dependent increase was found in NfL (2.36% per year) and GFAP (1.18% per year). Longitudinal evaluation of NfL was then conducted in a separate cohort of 80 NHV at baseline, day 14 (range 11-17), and day 28 (range 26-56). A 1.64-fold increase from baseline in serum NfL was calculated as the ULN. Putting this threshold into context with published reports on NfL across a large variety of injury and disease settings, the 1.64-fold threshold is well positioned to discriminate between healthy and NS injury. Altogether, these findings provide a framework for longitudinal monitoring of serum NfL as a biomarker for neuronal damage in multiple contexts of use, including drug-induced injury.

Indexed as

Neurofilament ProteinsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHealthy VolunteersHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedReference Valuestau ProteinsBiomarkersGFAP protein, humanGlial Fibrillary Acidic Proteinneurofilament protein LNeurofilament Proteinstau ProteinsUbiquitin ThiolesteraseBiomarkerGFAPNeurofilament light chainNfLTauUCH-L1

Identifiers

PMID40665000
PMCPMC12263756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.