ArticleJournal of anesthesia2026
Concomitant using bulbocavernosus reflex and motor-evoked potential from the external anal sphincter improves continuous monitoring for urinary function assessment during untethering surgery in children.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond baseline success: reconsidering the complementary role of dual-modality sacral monitoring in pediatric untethering surgery.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIntraoperative monitoring can be used to prevent postoperative urinary dysfunction due to surgical manipulation. However, preoperative neurological dysfunction and young age make monitoring challenging. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated the efficacy of combining two monitoring methods, the bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) and motor-evoked potential from the external anal sphincter (EAS-MEP) in assessing urinary function in the same pediatric patients during untethering surgery.
methodsWe retrospectively identified pediatric patients (aged < 6 years) who underwent BCR and EAS-MEP monitoring during untethering surgery between October 2013 and March 2022. Anesthesia was maintained using propofol or sevoflurane/opioid without neuromuscular blockade.
resultsWe identified 18 pediatric patients who underwent BCR and EAS-MEP monitoring during untethering surgery. Our results showed that the baseline success rates were 78%, 61%, and 89% for BCR, EAS-MEP, and the concomitant use of BCR and EAS-MEP, respectively. Furthermore, of the 18 pediatric patients, the two patients with new urinary dysfunction required postoperative urinary catheterization, and the three patients with worsened preoperative urinary dysfunction showed an increased frequency of catheterization. The accuracy of the BCR and EAS-MEP monitoring for the same patients was 93% and 91%, respectively.
conclusionThe accuracy of BCR and EAS-MEP monitoring is similar in pediatric untethering surgery, and the concomitant use of BCR and EAS-MEP improves continuous intraoperative monitoring compared with using only one method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40664982What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.