ArticleScientific reports2025
Interindividual and intraindividual differences in recovery of German junior female ice hockey players during 2020 World Championship Division IA tournament.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
World Championship tournaments pose multiple possible recovery-challenging conditions in ice hockey. This investigation aimed at assessing subjective recovery patterns of the German women's junior national ice hockey team during preparation camp and tournament of the 2020 World Championship Division IA. Players completed the German paper-pencil version of the Short Recovery and Stress Scale regularly over the 14-day survey period. The assessment analyzed potential recuperative effects of overnight recovery and recovery during the day reflected in recovery-stress states. Specifically, linear mixed modelling (LMM) was used to determine inter- and intraindividual response- and effect-profiles on recovery processes and changes over time. Three sets of contrasts were specified à priori for planned comparisons. Regarding main effects, results showed favorable recovery-stress states in the morning. Recovery generally seemed to decrease throughout the day and a generally higher recovery level during the tournament phase in comparison to the preparatory camp period was indicated. Results emphasized the need for considering interindividual differences concerning the perception of different recovery facets. This study could serve as a starting point for introducing the LMM approach into sports science for the examination and presentation of individual recovery and training response patterns and individual cases with recourse to group statistics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.