ArticleScientific reports2025
Isolation, characterization, and maintenance of native Swiss microalgae for biotechnological prospection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microalgae culture collections may contain unexplored strains with great biotechnological potential. Through sampling, identification, characterization, and maintenance of local strains, part of the work described here led to the establishment of the first public Swiss microalgae culture collection, AlgoScope. The potential biotechnological applications of 7 strains from among over 120 native strains were suggested based on growth parameters and biochemical composition. Under standardized growth conditions, Tetradesmus obliquus FAM 27852 and FAM 27855, Chloroidium saccharophilum FAM 27962, Chlorella vulgaris FAM 27965, Stichococcus sp. FAM 27986, Desmodesmus sp. FAM 28090, and Tetranephris brasiliensis FAM 28097 had growth rates of 0.24 d
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.