ArticleScientific reports2025
Developing a machine-learning model to enable treatment selection for neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reassessing the role of combined organ resection in cT4b esophageal cancer: feasibility, outcomes, and future directions.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Glutathione metabolism-associated resistance to cisplatin and 5-FU in esophageal cancer: a paired transcriptomic study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- AI-driven pathology in esophageal cancer: from early screening to precision prognostics.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel + cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil (CF) has been the standard treatment for stage II and III esophageal cancers, it is associated with severe adverse events caused by docetaxel. Consequently, this study aimed to construct a prognostic system for CF regimens, especially for locally advanced esophageal cancers. Biopsy specimens from 82 patients treated with the CF regimen plus radical surgery were analyzed. Variants in 56 autophagy- and esophageal cancer-related genes were identified using targeted enrichment sequencing. Overall, 13 single-nucleotide variants, including 8 non-synonymous single-nucleotide variants, were identified as significantly associated with esophageal cancer recurrence (p < 0.05). Particularly, variants of ATG2A p.R478C and ULK2 splice-site also showed significant differences in recurrence-free and overall survival. Subsequently, machine learning was used to construct a model for predicting esophageal cancer recurrence based on 21 features, including eight patient characteristics. A Naive Bayes machine-learning model was shown to be highly reliable for predicting esophageal cancer recurrence with an accuracy of 0.88 and an area under the curve of 0.9. We believe that our results provide useful guidance in the selection of neoadjuvant adjuvant chemotherapy, including avoidance of docetaxel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.