ArticleScientific reports2025
Associations between physical fitness and different aspects of screen time in children and adolescents.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dose-response association between different screen time behaviors and cardiorespiratory fitness among elementary and junior high school students: A population-based cross-sectional study in a Japanese city.Journal of exercise science and fitness · 2026Article
- Associations of Family Physical Activity Support and 24-Hour Movement Behaviors with Physical Fitness in Preschool Children: A Focus on MVPA.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Screen time and cardiorespiratory fitness in school-aged children: a sex-specific association independent of physical activity-evidence from Croatia.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main purpose of the study was to examine the associations between health-related physical fitness (PF) and screen time in school-going youth. A convenient sample of 3224 children and adolescents aged 10-14 years from 10 schools was recruited to participate in the study. The Health-Behaviours in School-aged Children questionnaire was used to assess the level of screen time during schooldays and weekend days in television (TV) viewing, playing video games (VG) and using electronic devices (ED). Muscular fitness (sit-ups in 30 s and standing broad jump), cardiorespiratory fitness (the 20 m shuttle run test) and motor competence (the 10 × 5 m shuttle run test) were tested to determine the level of PF. Raw data for each test were transformed to quartiles (independent variable), while the outcome variable was not meeting the screen guidelines (> 2 h/day) for each of the screen time behavior. The average total screen time was 9.1 (2.9) h/day. Youth who did not meet the screen guidelines performed significantly poorly than those who met with the guidelines, respectively. A graded inverse association between each PF test and not meeting the screen time guidelines was found. Individuals in upper quartiles of cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, and motor competence were less likely not to meet the screen time guidelines, compared to their peers in lower quartiles. Similar associations were observed, irrespective of sex. This study suggests that higher PF levels are strongly associated with less time spent in front of screens in a large sample of children and adolescents. From a public health perspective, enhancing muscular and cardiorespiratory fitness may be an adequate method to reduce screen time and re-allocate it to a more active lifestyle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.