ArticleScientific reports2025
Glyphosate and phosphate treatments in soil differentially affect crop microbiomes depending on species, tissue and growth stage.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Orchard management alters citrus root and rhizosphere microbiomes with functional consequences for plant performance.ISME communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs) are widely used for controlling weeds by inhibiting the shikimate pathway. However, the effects of GBH on non-target organisms, such as shikimate pathway-containing microbes, are understudied. Furthermore, the complex interactions between GBH and fertilizers are difficult to predict. Hence, we experimentally investigated the effects of GBH and phosphate fertilizer on the composition of endophytic bacterial communities of potato, faba bean and oat during early and late summer using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and on plant growth in late summer. GBH treatments significantly affected bacterial communities of early and late summer potato roots and late summer faba bean roots, while phosphate treatments significantly affected bacterial communities of late summer potato leaves, tubers and early summer faba bean leaves. The treatments reduced bacterial diversity in potato and oat and the abundance of putatively beneficial bacteria in potato and faba bean. However, these treatments increased the aboveground biomass of all crops. Thus, agrochemicals had variable effects across crops, tissues and growth stages. While improved crop yield is often prioritized in chemical-intensive farming, the effects of microbiome shifts on crop health need further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.