ArticleScientific reports2025
Follow-up of idiopathic osteosclerosis on cone-beam computed tomography: a retrospective longitudinal study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Migration in the Presence of Idiopathic Osteosclerosis: A Rare Case Report.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) follow-up of adult patients with asymptomatic, incidentally encountered idiopathic osteosclerosis (IO) to demonstrate its natural course. Retrospectively, 37 patients (mean age, 40.5 years; 19 females and 18 males) with mandibular IO were included, based upon clinico-radiological features. Inclusion criteria were a baseline and at least one follow-up CBCT scan after 12 months or later, no periapical inflammatory lesion, and no previous endodontic or surgical treatment in the respective dentate region. Changes of maximum axial and cranio-caudal diameter and morphology (tooth relationship, lesional shape, radiodensity, endosteum and mandibular canal relationship, root resorption) were evaluated in 45 lesions and descriptively analyzed. The interreader agreement was calculated for diameter and morphological evaluation by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and weighted κ statistics, respectively. The results showed that none of the lesions changed in diameter nor in morphology within the respective follow-up (mean, 19.0 months, maximum 96.0 months). Overall, there was high interreader agreement (up to ICC = 0.854, and weighted κ = 1). In conclusion, on CBCT, IO morphometrics and morphology may naturally remain unchanged in asymptomatic adults, even after up to eight years of follow-up. Consequently, once the diagnosis of IO has been established, CBCT follow-up might not be justified to prevent imaging overuse, which is associated with an excess of ionizing radiation exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.