Trial reportScientific reports2025
Effects of cartilage-supporting nutritional supplementation on knee osteoarthritis symptoms and quality of life in a 12-week randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent degenerative joint disease, often affecting the elderly, characterized by cartilage degradation and bone remodelling, leading to pain, stiffness, and impaired movement. This 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study investigated the efficacy of a formulation containing collagen type II, glucosamine hydrochloride and chondroitin sulfate, in alleviating knee OA symptoms in subjects with mild to moderate knee pain. Fifty-four participants were enrolled, with 52 completing the study. Participants were assessed using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), performance-based physical function tests and global assessment tests. Results indicated significant improvements in the verum group compared to placebo. KOOS subscales showed improvements in symptoms (8.16%, p < 0.05), sport/recreation (25.25%, p < 0.01), and quality of life (27.66%, p < 0.001). Stiffness improved by 14.68% (p < 0.05) in the verum group. Both groups exhibited significant pain reduction (KOOS pain, p < 0.001 and p < 0.01 for verum and placebo, respectively). Performance-based measures, such as the Chair Stand test, improved significantly in both groups, though other metrics showed no significant differences. The verum group exhibited a linear improvement over 12 weeks, contrasting with the placebo group's initial response and subsequent plateau. SF-36 Physical Component scores improved in both groups (p < 0.05), but mental health scores remained unchanged. Global assessment favoured the verum group, with more participants reporting OA improvement and recommending the product (p < 0.01). Biomarkers hsCRP and COMP showed no significant changes, likely due to sample variability. While the study did not achieve its primary endpoint, the nutritional formulation demonstrated an excellent safety profile and encouraging improvements in patient-reported symptoms and quality of life, warranting larger confirmatory trials.Registration number: DRKS00029563 05/10/2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.