ArticleInternational orthopaedics2025
Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon for Large to Massive Rotator Cuff Tears with Pseudoparalysis: A Prospective Clinical Study.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Incidence and risk factors of pseudoparesis in massive rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- An Arthroscopic Upper Superior Capsule Reconstruction Using a U-Fold Long Head of the Biceps Tendon Autograft for the Treatment of Irreparable Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Comment on: "Predictors of clinical outcomes in necrotizing fasciitis: a ten-year study".International orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Comparison of isolated tenotomy vs. tenotomy with tenodesis for long head of biceps tendon in middle-aged and elderly patients undergoing rotator cuff repair: a retrospective study.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundManaging large to massive rotator cuff tears accompanied by pseudoparalysis poses a considerable challenge in shoulder surgery. Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) is increasingly considered a viable surgical option, yet optimal graft choices and outcomes in pseudoparalysis patients remain under investigation. This study assesses the clinical effectiveness of arthroscopic SCR using the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) in patients with large-to-massive RCT, comparing outcomes between those with and without pseudoparalysis.
methodsA prospective analysis was carried out involving 28 patients (14 with pseudoparalysis and 14 without) who underwent SCR using LHBT between January 2022 and December 2023. Clinical outcomes were assessed before surgery and subsequently at three, six and 12 months following the procedure, utilizing the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and shoulder range of motion metrics.
resultsEach group demonstrated substantial gains in reducing pain, enhancing functional outcomes, and increasing shoulder mobility. VAS scores decreased markedly, and ASES and UCLA scores improved substantially in both groups. Forward elevation and external rotation improved significantly, with a slightly greater range observed in the non-pseudoparalysis group. Pseudoparalysis was successfully reversed in 92.85% of affected patients. No major complications were reported.
conclusionArthroscopic SCR using LHBT provides significant functional restoration and pain reduction in patients with massive RCT, effectively reversing pseudoparalysis in most cases. This technique offers a reliable and anatomically favorable graft option, supporting its use in both pseudoparalytic and non-pseudoparalytic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40664842What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.