ArticleScientific reports2025
Self-assessment of quality of life in patients after suffering from aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, principal component analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cognition and Health-Related Quality of Life After aSAH: The Role of Objective and Subjective Impairment.Neurology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quality of life (QoL) is one of the parameters that characterize the treatment success after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, along with overall survival and independent living without the need for care. Thus, the main aim of this research was to evaluate the quality of life of patients after endovascular or microsurgical treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. This study was performed at the Jena University Hospital in Germany. A total of 32 patients completed the German version of the WHO QoL Questionnaire during routine follow-up visits at our neurovascular outpatient clinic between January and September 2024. Analyses were stratified by the type of treatment. Patients who underwent endovascular treatment have better subjective reports of QoL in the psychological and environment domains, whereas those who underwent microsurgical clipping showed better outcomes in physical and social domains. Aneurysm location did not significantly impact QoL. To conclude, these findings suggest that different treatment modalities influence distinct aspects of QoL. Implementing treatment-tailored strategies, alongside comprehensive management of subarachnoid hemorrhage-related risks, may further enhance recovery and optimize functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.