ArticleScientific reports2025
Underwater fiber laser removal of synthetically cultured Caulobacter crescentus biofilms on aluminium using response surface methodology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biofouling can be considered the accumulation of microorganisms and other organisms on submerged surfaces. It poses operational and economic challenges across marine, industrial, and freshwater systems. Despite its relevance, freshwater biofilm removal remains understudied compared to marine biofouling. This study evaluates the use of fiber laser treatment to remove synthetically cultured Caulobacter crescentus biofilms formed on aluminium substrates submerged in a nutrient-rich microbiological growth medium. A response surface methodology was applied to optimize three laser processing parameters: laser power, laser speed, and repetition loops. The aim was to maximize biofilm removal efficiency while minimizing substrate damage. Results revealed that the number of repetition loops was the most significant factor, as multiple repetition loops compensated for energy losses caused by water absorption and the high thermal conductivity of aluminium. While increased laser power enhanced removal, its individual impact was less pronounced, and laser speed had minimal effect due to rapid thermal dissipation and water interference. A distinct white line, visible both macroscopically and microscopically, appeared in some laser-treated areas. Its origin is hypothesized to involve oxidation or material ablation, warranting further analysis. Response surface analysis demonstrated a non-linear relationship between biofilm removal width and both laser power and repetition loops, with peak efficiency observed at intermediate laser power levels. The observed curvature is attributed to the interplay of water turbulence, microbubble formation, and localized heat transfer dynamics. These findings highlight the complex nature of laser-biofilm interactions in submerged environments. This study contributes to the optimization of non-contact laser cleaning techniques for submerged applications and offers practical insights for industries such as water treatment, biomedical device maintenance, and antifouling surface design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.