Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40664788›Full record

ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2025

Effects of resource packaging on the adaptative and pleiotropic consequences of evolution.

Neetika Ahlawat, Pavithra Venkataraman, Raman Gulab Brajesh, Supreet Saini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Neetika Ahlawat *Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Pavithra Venkataraman *Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India. pavithrav@iitb.ac.in.
Raman Gulab BrajeshDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Supreet SainiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India. saini@che.iitb.ac.in.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust DBT India Alliance IA/S/19/2/504632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptation to an environment is enabled by the accumulation of beneficial mutations. How do adaptive trajectories and pleiotropic effects of adaptation change in response to "subtle" changes in the environment? Since there exists no molecular framework to quantify "subtle" environmental change, designing experiments to answer this question has been challenging. In this work, we address this question by studying the effects of evolution in environments which differ solely in the way sugars are presented to a bacterial population. Specifically, we focus on glucose and galactose, which can be supplied to an E. coli population as a mixture of glucose and galactose, lactose, or melibiose. We evolve six replicate populations of E coli for 300 generations in these three chemically correlated or "synonymous" environments, and show that the adaptive responses of these populations are not similar. When tested for pleiotropic effects of fitness in a range of non-synonymous environments, our results show that despite uncorrelated adaptive changes, the nature of pleiotropic effects is largely predictable based on the fitness of the ancestor in the non-home environments. Overall, our results highlight how subtle changes in the environment can alter adaptation, but despite sequence-level variations, pleiotropy is qualitatively predictable.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBiological EvolutionEscherichia coliGenetic PleiotropyGalactoseGlucoseLactoseMutationGalactoseGlucoseLactose

Identifiers

PMID40664788
PMCPMC12264277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.