ArticleScientific reports2025
Efficacy of swarm-based neural networks in automated depression detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metaheuristic-optimized cross-modal attention networks for multimodal mental health assessment in college students.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2026Article
- The analysis of the internet of things technology for mental health of sports education students based on big data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As depression becomes a global pandemic, this research paper presents a comprehensive study for depression diagnosis using a custom-crafted deep learning model optimized with various swarm intelligence algorithms. Three different optimization algorithms-dragonfly algorithm, Firefly Algorithm, and Moth Flame Optimization Algorithm-have been employed for feature selection and dimensionality reduction. The experiments were done with the DAIC-WOZ corpus, which is a benchmark dataset for depression detection. In the first experiment, the dragonfly algorithm was used and gave a macro F1 score 0.76, recall of 0.80, and precision of 0.74. The second experiment was the implementation of the Firefly Algorithm, which outperformed the first with a macro F1 score of 0.86, recall of 0.88, and precision of 0.85. The third experiment based on the Moth Flame Optimization Algorithm achieved a macro F1 score of 0.80, a recall rate of 0.79, and a precision of 0.72. Next, the models were put through two additional datasets to test how well they generalize. Therefore, the model achieved 0.92 F1 on the CMDC dataset and 0.82 on the MODMA dataset, establishing strong performance across different distributions of data. The results highlight how the integration of deep learning techniques with metaheuristic optimization algorithms can provide optimal and reliable depression diagnosis and thus create promising directions for further research in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.