ArticleScientific reports2025
Automated multi-model framework for malaria detection using deep learning and feature fusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A hybrid machine learning approach for automated malaria diagnosis from thin blood smear images.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Deep learning-assisted malaria microscopy with sensitivity-aware threshold optimization.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Optimized CNN framework for malaria detection using Otsu thresholding-based image segmentation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhancing Physicians' Adherence to the 2023 Sudan Malaria Case Management Protocol Using AI as an Intervention Tool.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Malaria remains a critical global health challenge, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions. While traditional methods for diagnosis are effective, they face some limitations related to accuracy, time consumption, and manual effort. This study proposes an advanced, automated diagnostic framework for malaria detection using a multi-model architecture integrating deep learning and machine learning techniques. The framework employs a transfer learning approach that incorporates ResNet 50, VGG16, and DenseNet-201 for feature extraction. This is followed by feature fusion and dimensionality reduction via principal component analysis. A hybrid scheme that combines support vector machine and long short-term memory networks is used for classification. A majority voting mechanism aggregates outputs from all models to enhance prediction robustness. The approach was validated on a publicly available dataset comprising 27,558 microscopic thin blood smear images. The results demonstrated superior performance, achieving an accuracy of 96.47%, sensitivity of 96.03%, specificity of 96.90%, precision of 96.88%, and F1-score of 96.45% using the majority voting ensemble. Comparative analysis highlights the framework's advancements over existing methods in diagnostic reliability and computational efficiency. This work underscores the potential of AI-driven solutions in advancing malaria diagnostics and lays the foundation for applications in other blood-borne diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.