Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40664696›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

An inventory of industrial solid waste in 337 cities of China: Applying machine learning for data completion.

Qian Jia, Kunsen Lin, Jiawei Zhuang, Dengyu Yang, Wei Wei, Xiong Xiao, Huanzheng Du, Tao Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qian JiaCollege of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, P.R. China.
Kunsen LinCollege of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, P.R. China.
Jiawei ZhuangCollege of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, 350100, Fujian, P.R. China.
Dengyu YangShanghai Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Particle Pollution and Prevention (LAP3), Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, P.R. China.
Wei WeiXiaping Environmental Park, Shenzhen, 518024, P.R. China.
Xiong XiaoXiaping Environmental Park, Shenzhen, 518024, P.R. China.
Huanzheng DuUNEP-Tongji Institute of Environment for Sustainable Development (IESD), Shanghai, 200092, P.R. China.
Tao WangCollege of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, P.R. China. a.t.wang@foxmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4688-5804

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid industrialization of China generated a massive quantity of waste, among them industrial solid waste contributed the biggest flow to some 60 gigatonnes (Gt) in the past two decades. A complete tempo-spatial dataset of industrial waste, however, is absent in many areas in China, due to numerous waste producers and insufficient statistical coverage. To fill up the gap, we collected current available data from thousands of sources. We further developed six machine learning models to complete the dataset across all the 337 cities in China for the period 1990-2022. Bayesian optimization was employed to obtain the best estimation model for each city and to enhance its performance and resilience. In addition to the aggregate waste amount, generation of six major subcategories of industrial waste, i.e., metallurgical slags, fly ash, furnace slags, coal gangue, tailings, and desulfurization gypsum, are presented for more than half of the cities in 2022. This dataset can help researchers and policymakers recognize and address challenges brought by industrial waste.

Identifiers

PMID40664696
PMCPMC12264156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.