ArticleNature communications2025
Evaluating the safety of XBB.1.5-containing COVID-19 mRNA vaccines using a self-controlled case series study.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Autoantibody and disease control stability following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in rheumatoid arthritis: an observational cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: a prospective outlook from technological innovation to clinical practice.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Association between nucleic acid COVID-19 vaccines and acute myocardial infarction in adults: a systematic review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Updated profiling of COVID-19 vaccine adverse events using VAERS case reports.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Next-Generation Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy for Food Allergy.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The safety of XBB.1.5-containing COVID-19 mRNA vaccines warrants investigation. We assessed the relative risk of 15 adverse events following the XBB.1.5 vaccination using a self-controlled case series study design with data from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) from September 11, 2023, to June 1, 2024 in the USA. Based on a baseline population of 244,494 patients, adverse events included Guillain-Barré syndrome, seizure, non-hemorrhagic stroke and transient ischemic attack, hemorrhagic stroke, narcolepsy or cataplexy, anaphylaxis, acute myocardial infarction, myo/pericarditis, coagulopathy, multisystem inflammatory syndrome, Bell's palsy, transverse myelitis, appendicitis, pulmonary embolism, and encephalitis. We found an association between vaccination and anaphylaxis (IRR [95% CI]: day 0-17.35 [9.32-30.03], day 1-9.35 [5.12-15.95], day 2-6.20 [3.40-10.57], <20 patients in each risk period). No other outcomes showed significantly increased risk following vaccination. Our results contribute to the safety profile evaluation for XBB.1.5-containing COVID-19 mRNA vaccines utilizing N3C big data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.