Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40664503›Full record

ReviewGenes & development2025

Killing wisely: precision senolytics in the age of frailty.

Valentin J A Barthet, Scott W Lowe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes & development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Valentin J A BarthetCancer Biology and Genetics Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA.
Scott W LoweCancer Biology and Genetics Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA; lowes@mskcc.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Impact of the aging niche on cancer phenotypes probed using mouse cancer models produced by somatic engineering.U01AG077921 · NIA · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI LOWE, SCOTT W. · 2021 to 2025
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIA NIH HHS U01 AG077921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular senescence plays a dual role in tissue biology by promoting tumor suppression and wound healing when transient but driving inflammation, fibrosis, and age-related disease when persistent. The growing recognition that senescent cell clearance can reverse these pathologies has catalyzed efforts to develop therapeutics that preferentially kill senescent cells (also known as "senolytics"). However, clinical translation from bench to bedside remains challenging due to senescent state heterogeneity, limited biomarkers, off-target toxicities, and the frailty of aged patients. Small molecule senolytics, although promising, often lack defined mechanisms of action and pose safety concerns that may constrain their use in older adults. Emerging precision approaches, including those that exploit surface markers and leverage engineered immune therapies, offer a rational and potentially more selective path forward. Here we highlight recent advances in senescence profiling and targeted clearance strategies, emphasizing the need for therapies designed with both biological complexity and the needs of aging populations in mind.

Indexed as

AgingCellular SenescenceFrailtyPrecision MedicineSenotherapeuticsAnimalsHumansSenotherapeuticsagingsenescencesenolytics

Identifiers

PMID40664503
PMCPMC12315863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.