Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40664422›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

SMS text message-delivered pain self-management intervention for patients undergoing total knee replacement surgery: protocol for a randomised controlled type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.

Claire Ashton-James, Ali Gholamrezaei, Elizabeth Walkley, Amy Gray McNeilage, David Liew, Charlotte Heldreich, Rachelle Buchbinder, Paul Glare, Andrew Hardidge

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Claire Ashton-JamesPain Management Research Institute, Kolling Institute, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia claire.ashton-james@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5547-4295
Ali GholamrezaeiPain Management Research Institute, Kolling Institute, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8674-450X
Elizabeth WalkleyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Amy Gray McNeilagePain Management Research Institute, Kolling Institute, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
David LiewDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8451-8883
Charlotte HeldreichDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Rachelle BuchbinderMusculoskeletal Health and Wiser Health Care Units, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Paul GlarePain Management Research Institute, Kolling Institute, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6850-7025
Andrew HardidgeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe efficacy and safety of SMS text message-delivered interventions for providing pain self-management education and improving clinical pain outcomes have been demonstrated in several randomised controlled trials. However, little is known about the feasibility and effectiveness of these interventions within Australian hospital settings. The current protocol describes a trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of an SMS text message-delivered intervention designed to support patients' engagement with pain self-management strategies and improve clinical pain outcomes after total knee replacement surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A hybrid, type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial will be conducted at a private hospital in Australia. Participants (n=130) will be randomised to either the intervention group (receiving a pain self-management educational video prior to surgery, plus daily SMS text message reminders for 3 weeks after surgery) or an active control group (receiving the pre-surgery video alone, without text message reminders) in addition to usual care. Effectiveness outcomes will be pain intensity (primary), opioid dose, knee function and pain-related distress and will be recorded at baseline, 3 days, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery using self-reported surveys. Pain self-efficacy and health-related quality of life will be measured at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-surgery. Implementation outcomes (Reach, Experience, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) will be evaluated using mixed (qualitative and quantitative) methods. This trial represents a first step towards the translation of digitally delivered postoperative support for engaging with pain self-management in the Australian healthcare system. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Austin Health Human Ethics Research Committee (Australia, HREC/110142/Austin-2024). Study results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific and professional meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12624001060538.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneePain ManagementPostoperative PainSelf-ManagementText MessagingAustraliaFemaleHumansMalePain MeasurementPatient Education as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf EfficacyDigital TechnologyImplementation ScienceORTHOPAEDIC & TRAUMA SURGERYPAIN MANAGEMENTRandomized Controlled TrialSelf-Management

Identifiers

PMID40664422
PMCPMC12265796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.