ArticleBMJ open2025
Increased direct oral anticoagulant use and event rates in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a nationwide retrospective registry study in Sweden.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temporal Trends in Anticoagulant Prescribing in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation According to Prior Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: Insights from the CRAFT Registry.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter Burden in the United States and the European Union: A Comparison and Assessment of Trends and Risk Factors.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleThe use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as stroke prophylaxis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) has increased steadily since the introduction in 2011. In Sweden today, more patients are treated with DOACs than with warfarin. However, it is not shown that an increased proportion of DOAC prescriptions correlates to lower event rates of stroke and systemic embolism.
objectivesThis study aims to investigate whether the increased prescription of DOACs in Sweden correlates with lower event rates for all-cause stroke, systemic embolism and bleeding complications, using real-life data for the whole NVAF population.
designNationwide retrospective register study.
settingData were obtained from the Swedish National Patient Registry, covering patients aged 18 years or older with NVAF, between 1 January 2014, and 31 December 2017. Exposure to oral anticoagulants was determined based on pharmaceutical data, calculating treatment duration by the number of pills dispensed and the prescribed daily usage rate. Baseline characteristics and endpoints were collected from hospital administrative registers using International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition (ICD-10) codes.
participantsAll patients with NVAF were identified using ICD-10 codes during the study period. Entry criteria included having a first recorded atrial fibrillation diagnosis after 1 January 2014 or being previously diagnosed with atrial fibrillation before 2014 but still receiving care after this date. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcomes were event rates (per 100 person-years) of ischaemic stroke, systemic embolism, all-cause stroke, major bleeding and intracranial bleeding (including haemorrhagic stroke). Event rates were calculated and compared across the study period using Cox proportional hazard models.
resultsIn the total NVAF population, the proportional decrease in event rates (per 100 treatment years) in 2017 compared with 2014 was ischaemic stroke 24% (1.70-1.30), all-cause mortality 4% (9.40-9.00), all-cause stroke 24% (2.10-1.60) and all-cause stroke and systemic embolism 23% (2.20-1.70). During the same time, the proportion of major bleeding and intracranial bleeding rates, including haemorrhagic stroke, also decreased: 5% (2.00-1.90), 6% (0.68-0.64) and 17% (0.30-0.25), respectively. DOACs use increased from 4.1% to 28.3% in the total population and from 22.7% to 60.9% in newly diagnosed patients.
conclusionsIn the initial years following the introduction when DOAC uptake in the population was high, an increasing proportion of Swedish NVAF patients receiving DOACs was accompanied by lower event rates of all-cause stroke and systemic embolism, ischaemic stroke and all-cause mortality, intracranial bleeding and major bleeding, highlighting the improved risk-benefit balance of DOACs in stroke prophylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.