ReviewTrends in cardiovascular medicine2025
Pushing the limits of LDL cholesterol: Emerging paradigms in cardiovascular risk reduction.
Review in Trends in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between PCSK9 Inhibitor Use and Risk of Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- A narrative review of PCSK9 inhibitors: from evolocumab to novel discoveries.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of Shenqi Yangxin formula in patients with stable coronary artery disease based on CCTA: rationale, design, and study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) has long been recognized as a primary contributor to cardiovascular disease. Over time, guideline-recommended LDL-C targets have varied considerably, trending toward progressively more aggressive therapeutic goals. The focus on residual risk reduction and development of novel therapies-including PCSK9 inhibitors, siRNA-based treatments, and ANGPTL3 inhibitors-have significantly expanded the options for achieving unprecedentedly low LDL-C levels. Given the fundamental role of cholesterol in cellular function, it has been long been postulated that very low cholesterol could be associated with adverse events. In this review, we dissect the benefits and potential risks of very low LDL-C levels. We begin by providing an overview of the evolution of LDL-C targets in previous guidelines and highlighting therapies-including newer agents-used for aggressive LDL-C lowering. Drawing on clinical and genetic evidence, we then examine the benefits and risks associated with achieving very low LDL-C levels. Finally, we present a practical framework for balancing the potential risks and benefits of intensive LDL-C reduction in patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.