ReviewOpen biology2025
Pattern recognition in living cells through the lens of machine learning.
Review in Open biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pattern recognition in living cells through the lens of machine learning.Open biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
At a coarse level, pattern recognition within cells involves sensing of environmental signals by surface receptors, and activating downstream signalling pathways that ultimately drive a transcriptome response, enabling biological functions such as differentiation, migration, proliferation, apoptosis or cell-type specification. This kind of decision-making process resembles a classification task that, inspired by machine learning concepts, can be understood in terms of a decision boundary: the combination of inputs relative to the classification region defined by this boundary defines context-specific responses. In this report, we contextualize machine learning concepts within a biological framework to explore the structural and functional similarities (and differences) between artificial neural networks, signalling pathways and gene regulatory networks. We take a preliminary look at neural network architectures that may better suit biological classification tasks, explore how learning fits into this paradigm, and address the role of competitive binding in cellular computation. Altogether, we envision a new research direction at the intersection of systems and synthetic biology, advancing our understanding of the inherent computational capacities of signalling pathways and gene regulatory networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.