ArticleCurrent biology : CB2025
Spindle checkpoint can secure additional cheating time for selfish expanded centromeres.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tuning Meiotic Checkpoints: Evolutionary Costs and Mechanistic Trade-Offs.Annual review of genetics · 2026Review
- Asymmetric evolution of satellite DNA on homologous and homeologous chromosomes in allotetraploid Narenga porphyrocoma.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Oocyte Kinetochores at the Nexus of Meiotic Drive and Segregation Fidelity.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Expanded centromeric satellite repeats can violate Mendel's law of segregation by preferentially segregating to the egg. In mice, these selfish centromeres enrich microtubule destabilizers at pericentromeres to detach from the spindle and flip toward the egg side of the meiotic spindle, thereby achieving preferential segregation. However, despite the consistent enrichment of destabilizers upon centromere expansion, such enrichment alone is insufficient to drive the preferential retention of expanded centromeres, suggesting a missing component in understanding their non-Mendelian segregation. Here, we propose that prolonged spindle checkpoint activation is crucial for expanded centromeres to cheat the segregation process by providing sufficient time for them to flip toward the egg side. By experimentally manipulating kinetochore size in a species-specific manner, we found that assembling larger kinetochores triggers robust spindle checkpoint activation, leading to anaphase delay and preferential retention of expanded centromeres in the egg. Comparisons across multiple hybrid mouse models revealed that centromeric satellite asymmetry does not consistently lead to kinetochore asymmetry and anaphase delay, explaining why satellite asymmetry does not always result in the preferential retention of larger centromeres. Altogether, this work highlights the significance of checkpoint activation in exploiting the inherent asymmetry in female meiosis and the distinct responses of kinetochore proteins and microtubule destabilizers to centromere expansion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.