ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2025
Using Data Mining to Differentiate Dengue with Warning Signs from Severe Dengue: A Predictive Model from Oaxaca, Mexico.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tree-Based Machine Learning for Diagnostic Classification of Dengue Fever Using Routine Hematological Parameters: A Secondary Analysis of a Publicly Available Dataset.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dengue with warning signs (DWS) and severe dengue are significant public health concerns in tropical and subtropical regions globally. Accurate and timely differentiation between these clinical forms of dengue, although crucial, is often complex. In this study, data mining techniques were applied to enhance diagnostic accuracy for clinical dengue (DWS and severe dengue) and to optimize clinical decision-making and patient management, particularly in resource-limited settings. A dataset of 1,341 patients from Oaxaca City, México was analyzed. The database was used to train and test different machine learning algorithms. Precision rates were 62.4% and 82.9% in differentiating between DWS and severe dengue, respectively, using the efficient linear support vector machine model. In addition, other performance metrics were used in the models, such as recall/sensitivity (90.8%), F1 score (73.8%), area under the curve (71.3%), and Cohen kappa (0.3593). The predictor weights were also analyzed with their Shapley values; the three most significant were hematemesis, ascites, and edema. In other words, these signs emerged as features that contribute most to the classification between DWS and severe dengue. These findings highlight the potential of data mining and machine learning techniques to enhance the differential diagnosis of dengue, particularly in resource-limited settings where timely intervention is crucial. Identifying critical risk factors with high specificity makes these models valuable tools for improving clinical decision-making and optimizing patient management. Future applications could enable health systems to prioritize resources more effectively during dengue outbreaks, ultimately contributing to better health outcomes in endemic regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.