Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2025
Stationary Cycling Exercise With Virtual Reality to Reduce Depressive Symptoms Among People With Mild to Moderate Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Virtual reality-based exercise interventions for the treatment of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of virtual reality exercise on social skills and emotional recognition among children with autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC psychology · 2026Pooled it
- Can exercise truly alleviate mild-to-moderate and subthreshold depression? Evidence from randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Effects of an Immersive Virtual Reality-Based Exercise Intervention on Psychological and Physiological Outcomes in College Students: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR serious games · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Virtual reality (VR) stationary cycling provides a potential solution to enhance adherence and reduce depressive symptoms, particularly for people with depression. However, high-quality evidence is needed to support its implementation in clinical practice. Objective: This study evaluated the clinical effects of a 12-week VR-based stationary cycling program on depressive symptoms in sedentary adults with mild to moderate depression. Methods: This study is a 12-week, 3-arm randomized controlled double-blind trial. Participants (aged 18-60 years) with depression were recruited from a clinic and randomly assigned (1:1:1) to the VR high-intensity stationary cycling, VR moderate-intensity stationary cycling, or non-VR moderate-intensity stationary cycling group to receive face-to-face intervention. The primary outcome was the change in depressive symptoms measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) between baseline and 12 weeks. Response rate, remission rate, satisfaction, compliance, and adverse events were assessed post intervention. Outcomes were analyzed using an ITT approach. Results: Between January 2023 and June 2024, a total of 114 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to 3 groups (38 per group), with 101 completing the trial (33 in non-VR moderate-intensity stationary cycling, 35 in VR moderate-intensity cycling, and 33 in VR high-intensity cycling). All 114 randomly assigned participants were included in the ITT analysis. After the 12-week intervention, all groups showed significant improvements in depressive symptoms, as reflected by the mean difference in HAMD-17 scores within groups from baseline to week 12: non-VR moderate intensity (mean difference within groups: 10.9, 95% CI 9.3-12.5; response rate: 58%, remission rate: 40%); VR moderate intensity (mean difference within groups: 14.2, 95% CI 12.7-15.8; response rate: 84%, remission rate: 74%); and VR high intensity (mean difference within groups: 14.4, 95% CI 13.0-15.8; response rate: 92%, remission rate: 74%). VR-based groups showed greater reductions than the non-VR group (mean difference between groups: 3.3, 95% CI 1.9-4.9, for VR moderate-intensity; mean difference between groups: 3.9, 95% CI 2.5-5.2, for VR high intensity). No significant difference in symptom improvement was found between the 2 VR groups, although the moderate-intensity group reported higher satisfaction. Conclusions: The VR stationary cycling program is an efficacious health intervention for alleviating depressive symptoms in participants with mild to moderate depression. These findings could facilitate incorporating VR health intervention into clinical practice, enhance the response of cycling-based interventions, and improve patient adherence, supporting its use as a complementary treatment for depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.