Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40663770›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

The Cost-Effectiveness of Adding Helicobacter Pylori Screening to the National Gastric Cancer Screening Program in Korea: Protocol for a Cost-Effectiveness Modeling Study.

Seowoo Bae, Joon Sung Kim, Moon Won Lee, Gwang Ha Kim, Young-Il Kim, Woon Tae Jung, Gwang Ho Baik, Beom Jin Kim, Joongyub Lee, Mina Suh and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. [Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment ofThe Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Seowoo Bae *National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8123-388X
Joon Sung Kim *Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9158-1012
Moon Won LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8411-6398
Gwang Ha KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9721-5734
Young-Il KimCenter for Gastric Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2614-3419
Woon Tae JungDepartment of Internal Medicine and Institute of Medical Science, College of Medicine, Gyeongsang National University and Hospital, Jinju, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1464-5462
Gwang Ho BaikDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1419-7484
Beom Jin KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0938-6697
Joongyub LeeDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2784-3772
Mina SuhNational Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8101-7493
Jae Gyu KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4841-9404

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Korea, the National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP) was implemented in 1999 and provides biennial endoscopy for adults aged ≥40 years. The NCSP has contributed to the early detection of gastric cancer and reduction of associated mortality in Korea. Helicobacter pylori is the main cause of gastric cancer. Screening for and eradication of H pylori reduces the incidence and mortality of gastric cancer. Previous studies have reported that screening for H pylori is a cost-saving intervention that can significantly decrease gastric cancer burden in areas with a high prevalence of H pylori infection. However, no study has examined whether incorporating H pylori screening into national endoscopic screening is cost effective.

objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of incorporating H pylori screening into Korea's National Gastric Cancer Screening Program.

methodsWe have developed a Markov model to compare two strategies: (1) endoscopy screening every 2 years starting at the age of 40 years (conventional screening), and (2) H pylori screening at the age of 40 years followed by continuous endoscopy screening every 2 years. We will also conduct a comparative analysis by varying the age at which the H pylori screening is performed. The primary outcome is the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR), calculated by dividing the incremental cost by the incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) between the two strategies. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis will be performed to test the uncertainty of the cost-effectiveness results. A sensitivity analysis will identify the most influential variables for cost-effectiveness.

resultsThe primary outcome parameter is the cost-effectiveness of adding H pylori testing to the current NCSP, which is expressed as the ICUR. Costs and utilities are discounted at an annual rate of 4.5%. The ICUR threshold is set at KRW 50 million (US $36,719), which is the South Korean gross domestic product per capita. This research has been funded by a Patient-Centered Clinical Research Coordinating Center grant from the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant RS-2024-00398474). This study will analyze and synthesize previously published information and is thus exempt from institutional review board approval. Data collection started in June 2024 and was completed in May 2025. Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences throughout 2025.

conclusionsWe will examine whether introducing H pylori testing and eradication therapy into the NCSP is a more cost-effective strategy for reducing gastric cancer risk than conventional endoscopy-based screening. Our study also examines the optimal age for H pylori screening, as well as the optimal screening frequency. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/72228.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisEarly Detection of CancerHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriMass ScreeningStomach NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMarkov ChainsMiddle AgedQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRepublic of Koreaeradicationgastric cancerHelicobacter pyloriprimary preventionscreening

Identifiers

PMID40663770
PMCPMC12308161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.