ReviewThe journal of physical chemistry. A2025
Roadmap for Molecular Benchmarks in Nonadiabatic Dynamics.
Review in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- From reproducibility to comparability in computational photochemistry: lessons from the PhotoChem explorer prototype.Faraday discussions · 2026Article
- Limitations of MRSF-TDDFT for Applications in Photochemistry.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2026Article
- DragonBall: A Suite for Vibrational Spectroscopy with Classical Trajectories.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2026Article
- The Importance of Going beyond the Independent Atom Model When Predicting UED Signals from Simulations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Kinetics of Submerged Intersystem Crossings in Strongly Coupled Ion-Molecule Reactions: IThe journal of physical chemistry. A · 2026Article
- Understanding the photochemistry of a crystalline push-pull norbornadiene photoswitch.Chemical science · 2026Article
- A Vibronic Coupling Model to Study the Nonadiabatic Dynamics of Polyenes.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2026Article
- Analytical Nuclear Gradients for the Multiconfigurational Self-Consistent Field Method Coupled with the Polarizable Fluctuating Charges Model.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- An Excitation Strategy for the Initial Condition Generation for Surface Hopping Trajectories Using Electron-Only Dynamics Including Explicit Laser Pulses.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Machine learning for nonadiabatic molecular dynamics: best practices and recent progress.Chemical science · 2025Review
- Perspective: Vibronic Coupling Potentials for Trajectory-Based Excited-State Dynamics.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Review
- Velocity Rescaling in Surface Hopping Based on Atomic Contributions to Electronic Transitions.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Simulation of ultrafast transient absorption spectra of a perylene-based light harvesting antenna.Chemical science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
45 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Simulating the coupled electronic and nuclear response of a molecule to light excitation requires the application of nonadiabatic molecular dynamics. However, when faced with a specific photophysical or photochemical problem, selecting the most suitable theoretical approach from the wide array of available techniques is not a trivial task. The challenge is further complicated by the lack of systematic method comparisons and rigorous testing on realistic molecular systems. This absence of comprehensive molecular benchmarks remains a major obstacle to advances within the field of nonadiabatic molecular dynamics. A CECAM workshop,
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.