ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Understanding Antecedents of Nurses' and Physicians' Workaround Behavior Regarding Hospital Information Systems: Qualitative Interview Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The mirrored burden and accountable handovers in cancer survivorship: co‑designing a post‑treatment transition standard.npj health systems · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hospital information systems (HISs) aim to support users in their time-critical routines on hospital wards with accurate and timely information. However, if these systems create blockages to workflows, nurses and physicians develop workarounds to provide care to the patients, nonetheless. Workarounds are considered negatively when associated with risks and positively when seen as feedback and a source of innovation. Learning about the antecedents of workarounds allows for the establishment of control mechanisms, under the promise of enhanced patient safety. Objective: This study seeks to explore which antecedents shape nurses' and physicians' workaround behavior in the context of HISs, how they influence behavior and interrelate, and the intentions with which they are carried out. Methods: Using 26 qualitative interviews with nurses, physicians, and health information technicians from Germany and the United States and applying grounded theory analysis techniques, we identify antecedents of HIS-related workarounds and respective relations. Results: From the interview transcripts, we derive 506 open codes which we cluster into 3 direct causes (organizational prerequisites, human factor, and system), and 4 influencing factors (regulations, sector funding, role of software providers, and role of ownership and management). While Influencing Factors constitute higher-level influences, they do not directly impact nurses' and physicians' behavior but rather depict the defaults that lead to conditions for Direct Causes of workarounds. Conclusions: This study provides an understanding of the antecedents of workarounds performed by medical personnel regarding HIS use, structures and categorizes them, and lays the foundation for an understanding of users' deviant behavior. Moreover, by revealing cause-effect relationships between the antecedents, we take on a behavioral perspective and provide a basis for developing effective strategies to prevent the need for workarounds. We contribute to the research stream of workarounds in health care and emphasize that once the reported and derived direct causes and influencing factors of workarounds have been tackled, working conditions, patient safety, and the overall quality of health care may improve under full digital support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.