Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40663651›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2025

Improved Speech Recognition in Adults With Conductive or Mixed Hearing Loss Using a Direct-to-Consumer Bone-Conduction Device: A Multiple Methods Intervention Study.

Thomas Hampton, Mark Fletcher, Alan Sanderson, Manuel Loureiro, Kevin Mortimer, Mahmood F Bhutta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas HamptonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, 160 Mount Pleasant, Liverpool, L3 5QA, United Kingdom, +44 7805098711.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6515-8058
Mark FletcherThe Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8638-8522
Alan SandersonUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-8855-3699
Manuel LoureiroUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6776-4481
Kevin MortimerCambridge Africa, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8118-8871
Mahmood F BhuttaUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4688-1670

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hearing loss affects 20% of the global population, including 250 million experiencing chronic suppurative otitis media, which can present challenges for conventional hearing aids due to ear discharge. Although assistive technology for hearing is available in high-income settings, provision is poor in low-income settings due to high costs and low availability of audiology services, reaching approximately 3% of those who could benefit from it. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a low-cost self-fitted direct-to-consumer bone-conduction headset for individuals with conductive or mixed hearing loss. Methods: We conducted a multiple methods study to test the efficacy and acceptability of this device using a purposive sample. Participants with a range of conductive and mixed hearing loss underwent speech-in-quiet speech audiometry with and without the device and took part in feedback interviews exploring their subjective impressions of the device. Results: In 33 participants, the device improved speech recognition in those with bone conduction thresholds <50 dB by a median of 11%, with larger air-bone gap associated with larger improvement. Participants rated the device positively on weight, style, and ease of use. Conclusions: This multiple methods study assessed the acceptability and efficacy of a low cost self-fitted bone-conduction device in adults. We found the device provides hearing benefit for those with conductive or mixed hearing loss (with bone conduction thresholds <50dB HL). Those with significant conductive hearing loss were measured to have their speech perception significantly improved. Participants had a mixed response to device aesthetics. Further studies should seek to establish if this type of device has effectiveness in real-world trials and which individuals are most likely to benefit. This low cost device could provide hearing benefits to millions of people without access to other devices. Product designers and clinical researchers should explore device optimization. Given the economic impacts of hearing loss across the globe, this style of self-fitted device could represent a paradigm shift in future assistive technology for hearing loss, in both high and low resource settings.

Indexed as

assistive technologyauditory perceptioncost efficienthealth interventionhealth resourceshearing aidshearing lossmedical devicemixed-methods studyotitis mediarehabilitationrehabilitation devicerehabilitation technologyspeech recognitionwearable electronic devices

Identifiers

PMID40663651
PMCPMC12282675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.