ArticlePloS one2025
Research on quantitative evaluation of China's Intelligent Construction Policy (CICP) based on the integration of PMC index model and multi-dimensional analytical framework.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a systematic evaluation of China's Intelligent Construction Policies (CICP) from 2010 to 2022, employing a quantitative approach based on the Policy Modeling Consistency (PMC) index model. Through text mining and bibliometric analysis, we assess the formulation quality, evolution, and effectiveness of 30 national policies, identifying distinct phases of development: the Cultivation and Exploration Phase (CEP: 2010-2019) and the Development and Promotion Phase (DPP: 2020-2022). The results demonstrate a significant improvement in policy quality, with the DPP achieving higher PMC scores and more frequent issuance of "Excellent" and "Positive" policies. Key findings reveal the transition from fragmented, exploratory policies to integrated, goal-oriented strategies, emphasizing industrialization, digitalization, and sustainability. However, gaps remain in policy scope, effectiveness, and incentive mechanisms. The study concludes with targeted recommendations for optimizing CICP, including expanding policy scope, enhancing implementation frameworks, and fostering public-private innovation ecosystems to align with technological advancements and industry demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.