ArticlePloS one2025
Applying binary mixed model to predict knee osteoarthritis pain.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatially resolved longitudinal changes in tibial subchondral trabecular bone texture for exploratory prediction of incident knee osteoarthritis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Data used to understand knee osteoarthritis (KOA) often involves knee-level, rather than person-level information. Failure to account for the correlation between joints within a person may lead to inaccurate inferences. The aim of this study was to develop a flexible, data-driven framework for predicting knee pain outcomes, incorporating the advantages of both random forest (RF) and mixed effects models for correlated data. Specifically, we utilized data from the baseline visit of the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) and applied the Binary Mixed Models (BiMM) algorithm to predict two binary dependent variables. 1) presence of knee pain, stiffness or aching in the past 12 months and 2) presence of knee pain indicated by a KOOS pain score > 85. This novel approach was compared to standard random forests (RF), which do not account for correlations among knees. This study demonstrates the potential of BiMM as a predictive tool for KOA pain, achieving a comparable or slightly improved performance over traditional RF models while simultaneously accounting for within-person correlation among knees. This is a significant advancement, as most machine learning models to date have only considered each knee individually. These findings support the integration of BiMM in KOA outcome prediction, providing a nuanced alternative to existing models and advancing our understanding of important KOA outcomes on the person level. Although demonstrated here for KOA, this method is relevant to any situation where within-person correlations are relevant, including other joints and other musculoskeletal conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.