Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40663537›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Consensus structure prediction of A. thaliana's MCTP4 structure using prediction tools and coarse grained simulations of transmembrane domain dynamics.

Sujith Sritharan, Raphaelle Versini, Jules D Petit, Emmanuelle E Bayer, Antoine Taly

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The influence of electrical charge on plasmodesma conductivity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sujith SritharanLaboratoire de Biochimie Théorique, CNRS (UPR9080), Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0580-1021
Raphaelle VersiniLaboratoire de Biochimie Théorique, CNRS (UPR9080), Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Jules D PetitLaboratoire de Biogenèse Membranaire, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5200, Université de Bordeaux, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Villenave d'Ornon, France.
Emmanuelle E BayerLaboratoire de Biogenèse Membranaire, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5200, Université de Bordeaux, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Villenave d'Ornon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8642-5293
Antoine TalyLaboratoire de Biochimie Théorique, CNRS (UPR9080), Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5109-0091

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple C2 Domains and Transmembrane region Proteins (MCTPs) in plants have been identified as important functional and structural components of plasmodesmata cytoplasmic bridges, which are vital for cell-cell communication. MCTPs are endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-associated proteins which contain three to four C2 domains and two transmembrane regions. In this study, we created structural models of Arabidopsis MCTP4 ER-anchor transmembrane region (TMR) domain using several prediction methods based on deep learning (DL). This region, critical for driving ER association, presents a complex domain organization and remains largely unknown. Our study demonstrates that using a single deep-learning method to predict the structure of membrane proteins can be challenging. Our models presented three different conformations for the MCTP4 structure, provided by different deep learning methods, indicating the potential complexity of the protein's conformational landscape. We then used physics-based molecular dynamics simulations to explore the behaviour of the TMR of MCTPs within the lipid bilayer.We found that the TMR of MCTP4 is not rigid but can adopt multiple conformations. The membrane-embedded region contains two helical pairs: HP1 (TM1-TM2) and HP2 (TM3-TM4). Deep learning predictions revealed three distinct types of inter-helical contact interfaces: ESMFold, AlphaFold-Multimer, trRosetta, and RoseTTAFold consistently predicted a TM2-TM3 contact; AlphaFold2 did not predict any contact between these two helical pairs, while OmegaFold instead suggested a TM1-TM4 interface. Our physics-based coarse-grained simulations not only confirmed the contacts predicted by these models but also revealed a broader conformational landscape. In particular, structural clustering identified five distinct conformational clusters, with additional and more extensive inter-helical contacts not captured by the deep learning predictions. These findings underscore the complexity of predicting protein structures. We learned that combining different methods, such as deep learning and simulations, enhances our understanding of complex proteins.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsMembrane ProteinsDeep LearningEndoplasmic ReticulumMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein ConformationProtein DomainsArabidopsis ProteinsMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID40663537
PMCPMC12262843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.