ArticlePloS one2025
Automatic identification and characteristics analysis of crack tips in rocks with prefabricated defects based on deep learning methods.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In complex geological environments, the morphology, orientation and distribution characteristics of cracks in the rock directly affect the stability assessment for rock masses and engineering safety decisions. However, the traditional manual interpretation method is inefficient and influenced by subjective factors, which makes it tough to fulfill the requirements for high-precision and automated detection. Especially in the rock specimen analysis of prefabricated multi-angle cracks, image quality and algorithm adaptability have emerged as the critical bottlenecks restricting the identification accuracy. For this reason, it is pressingly essential to realize high-precision and automatic identification in the crack tip of the rock. Firstly, in this study, SCB semi-circular disk specimens are exposed to three-point bending loading, which is sandstone with prefabricated cracks at 0°, 15°, 30°, 45° and 60°. The microsecond-level expansion process of multi-directional cracks is monitored by utilizing an ultrafast camera in the rock specimens. Secondly, three equalization methods are applied to the collected crack images of the rock specimens, including HE, AHE, and CLAHE, to enhance the accuracy of identifying cracks in the rock specimens. And the preprocessed crack images of the rock specimens are compared, which reveals the CLAHE method possesses the optimum preprocessing effect. Based on this, pixel-level annotations are performed on the pretreated crack images, and a dataset is established about cracks in the rock specimen at five different angles. The Deeplabv3 network and the U-Net network are adopted to build cracks recognition models of the rock specimen to predict and identify the crack tips on the rock. The final results demonstrate that the recognition accuracy of the U-net model is able to reach up to 99.4%, the precision is capable of amount to 97.3%, and the recall rate can attain to 95.6%, in the cracks identification of the rock sample with various angles. The recognition accuracy, the precision, and the recall rate of the U-net model have increased by 0.5%, 2.3%, and 4.3% respectively compared with the Deeplabv3 model. The research results provide new ideas for the intelligent detection of cracks in the rock mass, which offer high-confidence data support for engineering decisions in complex geological environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.