ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
At-Home Evaluation of Both Wearable and Touchless Digital Health Technologies for Measuring Nocturnal Scratching in Atopic Dermatitis: Analytical Validation Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emerald Touchless Sensor Quantifies Nighttime Scratching and Sleep Quality in Children With Atopic Dermatitis: PEDISTAD EMERALD Study.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The most common symptom of atopic dermatitis (AD) is pruritus, which is often exacerbated at night and leads to nocturnal scratching and sleep disturbance. The quantification of nocturnal scratching provides an objective measure, which could be used as a clinical trial endpoint tracking this AD-related behavior. However, it is not clear how digital health technologies (DHTs) intended to measure scratching perform in the real-world environment of patient homes. Objective: In this study, we present the analytical validation of 2 DHTs: the GENEActiv wristband with Philips sleep and scratch algorithms ("Philips") and the Emerald radio frequency touchless sensor ("Emerald") to measure nocturnal scratching in adults with AD. Methods: Thirty-one participants (15 with moderate AD, 11 with mild AD, and 5 healthy volunteers) were enrolled in the study. Nocturnal scratching was assessed by each DHT in the study participant's home environment over a 4-week observation period. Infrared videos were recorded during sleep twice per week and manually annotated for the intended sleep window (total sleep opportunity [TSO]) and scratching events. Human annotations for sleep and scratch measures were used as a reference for comparison with DHTs ("Reference"). Estimated TSO was compared for each DHT to Reference using Bland-Altman analysis. Within-night agreement of DHT-predicted scratching events versus the Reference was assessed by sensitivity, precision, and F1-score. Intraclass correlation was used to compare night-level scratch summaries (scratch duration per hour of TSO and scratch frequency per hour of TSO) between each DHT and the Reference. Results: Characterization of human-annotated scratching revealed a basal level of scratching in both healthy volunteers (13.1 seconds per hour) and in participants with AD on nights when no itch was reported (10.2 seconds per hour). The TSO window was quantified accurately with both DHTs having a mean bias compared with Reference of <30 minutes. The within-night agreement with reference to scratch detection performance resulted in F1-scores at the disease group level ranging from 0.51 to 0.68 for the Emerald DHT and 0.47 to 0.56 for the Philips DHT. The night-level agreement of nocturnal scratch duration and frequency with human raters fell mostly in the moderate-good range of intraclass correlation coefficients (0.5-0.9) in participants with AD and was not significantly lower than the level of agreement between any 2 human raters. Conclusions: These results support the analytical validity of both DHTs tested for continuous measurement of nocturnal scratching in individuals with AD in the home environment. Opportunities remain for improving the performance of the DHTs tested, especially in the precision of wrist-worn accelerometer scratch detection, to reach human-level performance. Additional data collection in diverse patient populations will be beneficial for practitioners intending to use or improve these tools for quantifying nocturnal scratching behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.