ArticleShock (Augusta, Ga.)2026
Continuous Antithrombin III Infusion in a Clinically Relevant Sepsis Model.
Article in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBolus antithrombin III (AT) improved sepsis/organ dysfunction and survival in lipopolysaccharide/monomicrobial infusion pretreatment animal models; however, AT failed in clinical trials. Because insults and drug administration schedules differed between preclinical and clinical settings, we re-examined AT using a clinically relevant polymicrobial insult (cecal ligation and puncture, CLP) and a new method to continuously infuse AT after animals became ill.
methodsMice were catheterized with saline-filled osmotic minipumps. During CLP surgery we inserted AT- or saline-containing minipumps. We created and validated a ~6 h delay between sepsis induction and treatment. We compared delayed, continuous AT infusion with a conventional bolus AT injection using survival studies and 48-h studies.
results6-h delayed, continuous AT infusion significantly improved 7-d survival versus saline infusion (65% vs. 29%, n = 21, P = 0.018) and versus a single injection of AT (65% vs. 19%, n = 21, P = 0.003). Delayed, continuous AT attenuated liver but not kidney or lung injury. Vascular leakage and inflammatory cytokines were suppressed only in liver. The highest accumulation of bacteria and thrombin at 48 h was in liver. AT did not change organ bacterial counts.
conclusionsDelayed, continuous AT infusion improved 7-d survival after CLP compared to single bolus AT injection or continuous vehicle. Liver may be critical in abdominal sepsis because of bacterial accumulation and subsequent thrombin generation. AT may be protective due to attenuation of thrombin-induced vascular leakage, inflammation, and liver injury during CLP sepsis. Because other organs were unprotected, AT may be combined with drugs protecting different organs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.