ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Development and Validation of a Large Language Model-Powered Chatbot for Neurosurgery: Mixed Methods Study on Enhancing Perioperative Patient Education.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation Methods for Inference-Time Retrieval-Augmented and Graph Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models in Health Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- An agentic AI framework for integrated decision support and surgical planning in intracerebral hemorrhage.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Urologic Documentation: A Review of Emerging Capabilities and the Ongoing Need for Human Oversight.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- Development and Evaluation of an Augmented Artificial Intelligence Model for Urogynecology Queries.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Patient perspective on large-language model responses to questions about Moyamoya.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
- Preparedness for generative AI adoption among Chinese cancer survivors: a multi-center cross-sectional survey study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerioperative education is crucial for optimizing outcomes in neuroendovascular procedures, where inadequate understanding can heighten patient anxiety and hinder care plan adherence. Current education models, reliant on traditional consultations and printed materials, often lack scalability and personalization. Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbots have demonstrated efficacy in various health care contexts; however, their role in neuroendovascular perioperative support remains underexplored. Given the complexity of neuroendovascular procedures and the need for continuous, tailored patient education, AI chatbots have the potential to offer tailored perioperative guidance to improve patient education in this specialty.
objectiveWe aimed to develop, validate, and assess NeuroBot, an AI-driven system that uses large language models (LLMs) with retrieval-augmented generation to deliver timely, accurate, and evidence-based responses to patient inquiries in neurosurgery, ultimately improving the effectiveness of patient education.
methodsA mixed methods approach was used, consisting of 3 phases. In the first phase, internal validation, we compared the performance of Assistants API, ChatGPT, and Qwen by evaluating their responses to 306 bilingual neuroendovascular-related questions. The accuracy, relevance, and completeness of the responses were evaluated using a Likert scale; statistical analyses included ANOVA and paired t tests. In the second phase, external validation, 10 neurosurgical experts rated the responses generated by NeuroBot using the same evaluation metrics applied in the internal validation phase. The consistency of their ratings was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Finally, in the third phase, a qualitative study was conducted through interviews with 18 health care providers, which helped identify key themes related to the NeuroBot's usability and perceived benefits. Thematic analysis was performed using NVivo and interrater reliability was confirmed through Cohen κ.
resultsThe Assistants API outperformed both ChatGPT and Qwen, achieving a mean accuracy score of 5.28 out of 6 (95% CI 5.21-5.35), with a statistically significant result (P<.001). External expert ratings for NeuroBot demonstrated significant improvements, with scores of 5.70 out of 6 (95% CI 5.46-5.94) for accuracy, 5.58 out of 6 (95% CI 5.45-5.94) for relevance, and 2.70 out of 3 (95% CI 2.73-2.97) for completeness. Qualitative insights highlighted NeuroBot's potential to reduce staff workload, enhance patient education, and deliver evidence-based responses.
conclusionsNeuroBot, leveraging LLMs with the retrieval-augmented generation technique, demonstrates the potential of LLM-based chatbots in perioperative neuroendovascular care, offering scalable and continuous support. By integrating domain-specific knowledge, NeuroBot simplifies communication between professionals and patients while ensuring patients have 24-7 access to reliable, evidence-based information. Further refinement and research will enhance NeuroBot's ability to foster patient-centered communication, optimize clinical outcomes, and advance AI-driven innovations in health care delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.