Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40663325›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Large Macrocyclic Libraries via Thioether Cyclization.

Alexander L Nielsen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alexander L NielsenInstitute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, School of Basic Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland. axee@novonordisk.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrocyclic peptides, known for their high specificity, binding affinity, and potential membrane permeability, represent a promising modality in drug discovery, particularly for intracellular targets deemed undruggable by conventional small molecules. Traditional methods for macrocycle synthesis often involve labor-intensive purification steps, limiting throughput and scalability. This protocol presents a streamlined approach for the synthesis of large macrocyclic peptide libraries, utilizing solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) followed by purification-free cyclization of linear dithiol peptides in high-throughput array formats. The workflow incorporates automated peptide synthesis, efficient resin preparation, and thioether cyclization strategies, enabling the generation of diverse libraries suitable for screening campaigns. Key features include the use of bis-electrophilic linkers for cyclization, quality control via LC-MS, and optional concentration assays. This robust method accelerates the development of macrocyclic libraries, facilitating the discovery of drug candidates targeting challenging biomolecular interactions.

Indexed as

Macrocyclic CompoundsPeptide LibraryPeptides, CyclicSulfidesChromatography, LiquidCyclizationDrug DiscoverySolid-Phase Synthesis TechniquesMacrocyclic CompoundsPeptide LibraryPeptides, CyclicSulfidesCombinatorial librariesCyclic peptidesHigh-throughput experimentationMacrocycles

Identifiers

PMID40663325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.