ArticleDiscover oncology2025
A machine learning-based screening model for the early detection of prostate cancer developed using serum microRNA data from a mixed cohort of 8,741 participants.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEarly detection of prostate cancer (PCa) can improve the prognosis of patients. Currently, the role of the prostate specific antigen test for PCa screening remains debatable. We aimed to develop an efficient and clinically applicable method for the screening of PCa by the noninvasive screening of several serum microRNA (miRNA) levels.
methodsA mixed cohort, including PCa, multiple other cancers (OCa), benign prostate disease (BPD) and health population (HP), study with 8,741 samples was conducted. Six machine learning algorithms were employed to develop a screening model for PCa using the training dataset. The performance of models was assessed using the testing dataset, and the model with the optimal predictive power was chosen for further analysis. Furthermore, the detection performance of the screening model was evaluated using validation set, external set and clinical subset analysis.
resultsWe first constructed a PCa early screening model named PCa4miR using only four miRNAs (miRNA-1290, miRNA-6777-5p, miRNA-1343-3p and miRNA-6836-3p), the overall sensitivity was 88.5%, and the specificity was 95.9%. The testing set (AUC = 0.972), validation set (AUC = 0.981) and external set (AUC = 0.811) were used to evaluate the model. The model has excellent discriminative ability for identifying PCa, distinguishing them from individuals with BPD, OCa, and HP as shown by the detection index calculations. The results of subgroup analysis showed that the model had excellent detection accuracy in different clinical subgroups of PCa. Additionally, we used the ratio of miR-1290/miRNA-6836-3p, miR-6777-5p/miRNA-6836-3p and miR-1343-3p/miR-6087 to establish a screening scoring model for PCa (PCaSS) with excellent detection efficacy. The PCaSS model is the first scoring model for PCa using serum miRNA ratios.
conclusionUsing the largest known sample size and the most complex mixed cohort, we have successfully devised efficient screening models for prostate cancer, namely PCa4miR and PCaSS. These models have demonstrated exceptional screening accuracy, underscoring their capacity for the early detection of prostate cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.