Trial reportJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2025
Intraoperative analgesia management by monitoring the analgesia nociception index in gynecological surgeries involving erector spinae plane block: a randomized controlled study.
Trial report in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To determine the effect of monitoring the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) on intraoperative opioid use, postoperative recovery, and analgesia in patients receiving preoperative bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for gynecological surgery under general anesthesia. Eighty patients classified in the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III scheduled for hysterectomy under general anesthesia were included in the study. After ultrasound-guided ESPB, patients were divided into 2 groups: control and ANI. In the control group, the intraoperative remifentanil infusion dose was adjusted using conventional methods; in the ANI group, the dose was adjusted according to ANI values of 50-70. Intraoperative remifentanil consumption, postoperative pain scores, additional analgesic requirements, and complications were recorded. Intraoperative remifentanil consumption was lower in the ANI group than in the control group (p < 0.001). Numerical rating scale (NRS) scores and requirements for additional analgesics in the postoperative recovery unit were both lower in the ANI group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of nausea or vomiting in the recovery unit. ANI monitoring in patients undergoing gynecological surgery under general anesthesia with ESPB reduced opioid consumption during the intraoperative period. Intraoperative ANI monitoring enabled individualized opioid administration and guided determination of the required dose of analgesic agent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40663304What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.