Observational studyCardiovascular drugs and therapy2026
Real-World Efficacy of Inclisiran in Veneto Region (Italy): The INCLIVEN Multicenter Registry.
Observational study in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2026. The graph read 2 numbers from its abstract, feeding 1 cell of the map, but none could be read as for or against, so it casts no vote. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against
RESULTS: Mean LDL-C levels at baseline (n = 240) were 118.7 ± 48.7 mg/dl, then they significantly fell to 56.7 ± 40.4 mg/dl (-52.3 ± 24.3%; p < 0.001) at 3 months (n = 238) and to 60.5 ± 40.1 mg/dl (-50.0 ± 22.7%; p < 0.001) at 9 months (n = 138).
RESULTS: Mean LDL-C levels at baseline (n = 240) were 118.7 ± 48.7 mg/dl, then they significantly fell to 56.7 ± 40.4 mg/dl (-52.3 ± 24.3%; p < 0.001) at 3 months (n = 238) and to 60.5 ± 40.1 mg/dl (-50.0 ± 22.7%; p < 0.001) at 9 months (n = 138).
clause the extractor read what became the number
Where it lands on the map
Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.
What it adds to each cell
For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.
PCSK9 inhibitors×lipids
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →34 readable studies in this cell: 29 favour the treatment, 2 find no difference, 3 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety of Inclisiran-An Assessment of the Consistency Between Randomized Controlled Trials and Real-World Evidence: A Systematic Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The 2025 ESC/EAS Dyslipidaemia Focused Update: Clinical Interpretation and Practical Implications.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Review
- Inclisiran in a real-world single-center registry of patients with very high atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk.Atherosclerosis plus · 2025Article
- The role of three glucose/lipid composite indices (CHG, TYG, and AIP) in predicting carotid plaque and fatty liver outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.
purposeInclisiran is a long-acting small interfering RNA (siRNA) which prevents the synthesis of PCSK9 in hepatocytes, reducing LDL-C concentration. Only limited data are available in the literature regarding its use in real-world settings.
methodsIn this observational multicenter registry, we included high cardiovascular risk patients from 12 lipid clinics in the Veneto region of Italy who started inclisiran therapy between October 2022 and February 2024. Primary endpoint was changes in LDL-C concentrations at 3 months of follow-up after inclisiran administration. Secondary endpoints were changes in LDL-C concentrations at 9 months of follow-up, safety, percentage of patients reaching LDL-C targets and efficacy of inclisiran according to background therapy and clinical characteristics of the population.
resultsMean LDL-C levels at baseline (n = 240) were 118.7 ± 48.7 mg/dl, then they significantly fell to 56.7 ± 40.4 mg/dl (-52.3 ± 24.3%; p < 0.001) at 3 months (n = 238) and to 60.5 ± 40.1 mg/dl (-50.0 ± 22.7%; p < 0.001) at 9 months (n = 138). Three (1.3%) patients reported mild injection-site side effects. LDL-C target achievement according to ESC/EAS 2019 guidelines was 64.7% at 3 months and 62.3% at 9 months. Patients on statin therapy had a greater LDL-C reduction compared to patients with statin intolerance. At 3 months across we observed greater LDL-C reduction in patients with diabetes (59.9 ± 23.2% vs 49.7 ± 24.1%; p = 0.004). In the multivariable analysis diabetes mellitus (p = 0.006) and background statin therapy (p = 0.034) were independent predictors for greater LDL-C reduction.
conclusionThis real-world multicenter registry supports inclisiran as an effective, well-tolerated option for managing hypercholesterolemia in high cardiovascular risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.