Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40663297›Full record

ArticleClinical child and family psychology review2025

Culturally Relevant Coparenting Interventions for Diverse Families: A Scoping Review.

Isha Dua, Parker Grant, Jazzmin Demy, Heather Prime

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical child and family psychology review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Isha DuaDepartment of Psychology, York University, Behavioural Sciences Building, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON, M3J1P3, Canada.ORCID 0009-0006-5944-7212
Parker GrantAddictions Division and Centre for Complex Interventions, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health and Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0005-7577-1226
Jazzmin DemyDepartment of Psychology, York University, Behavioural Sciences Building, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON, M3J1P3, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-4232-9240
Heather PrimeDepartment of Psychology, York University, Behavioural Sciences Building, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON, M3J1P3, Canada. hprime@yorku.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-7387-0398

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study is a scoping review on coparenting interventions with diverse families to assess how the characteristics, needs, and perspectives of participating coparents are addressed. We followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Eligibility criteria: participants belonged to racially minoritized groups (≥ 50% sample); studies reported on an intervention; the intervention targeted the coparental relationship OR assessed coparenting as an outcome. Demographics, study, and intervention characteristics, and the process and content of cultural adaptation were extracted. A systematic search was last executed in April 2025 in PsycINFO and MEDLINE, which yielded 1875 records. Following abstract/title screening, 409 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 35 studies were included in the review. Studies prioritized surface-level (e.g., language) over deep-level dimensions (e.g., goals). Few studies used an adaptation framework. We discuss how researchers and clinicians can consider the unique experiences of coparenting in diverse communities.

Indexed as

Cultural DiversityCulturally Competent CareParentingHumansCommunity-engaged practiceCoparenting interventionsCultural adaptationsRacially minoritized familiesScoping review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.