ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025
Impact of anastomotic leakage and radiotherapy on long-term quality of life after sphincter-saving rectal resections.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Incremental Predictive Value of Conventional MRI Pelvimetry for Major Low Anterior Resection Syndrome After Rectal Cancer Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe impact of anastomotic leakage (AL) on quality of life (QoL) following low anterior resections (LAR) remains a pressing concern, particularly as advancements in surgical techniques and multimodal treatments have resulted in an increasing number of survivors.
methodsThis study evaluated how AL affected health-related QoL in patients treated at the Department of Surgery, University hospital Mannheim of Heidelberg University from 2010 to 2021, utilizing the LARS score, the EORTC QLQ-C30, and the EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaires.
resultsThe study included 20 patients in each group, with those having AL matched 1:1 to control subjects without AL, based on criteria such as age, gender, comorbidities, tumor location, and resection degree. Both groups showed impaired QoL in EORTC assessments, with no statistically significant differences except in the abdominal pain scale of EORTC QLQ-CR29, which was higher for AL patients (19.99 ± 22.68 vs. 6.66 ± 17.43; p = 0.03). Comparison of QoL between patients who received neoadjuvant radiotherapy and those who did not, independent of AL, revealed significantly reduced QoL in several scales of both the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 assessments. A statistically significant worsening of QoL was observed in the sore skin domain (36.66±34.81 for RT vs. 3.70±11.11 without RT; p = 0.02) of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 among AL patients who received neoadjuvant radiotherapy. AL patients treated with Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy (EVT) showed improved QoL.
conclusionsAL alone does not appear to be an independent risk factor for impaired QoL after LAR for rectal cancer. However, the combined effect of AL and neoadjuvant radiotherapy may contribute to worse functional outcomes, significantly impacting QoL. Effective AL management with EVT can help mitigate these effects and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.