Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40663257›Full record

ReviewPlanta2025

Harnessing CRISPR/Cas9 in engineering biotic stress immunity in crops.

Bayram Ali Yerlikaya, Seher Yerlikaya, Batuhan Gül, Hümeyra Yoldaş, Musa Kavas, Heba I Mohamed

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Planta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bayram Ali YerlikayaDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey. bayram.yerlikaya@omu.edu.tr.
Seher YerlikayaDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.
Batuhan GülDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.
Hümeyra YoldaşDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.
Musa KavasDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.
Heba I MohamedDepartment of Biological and Geological Sciences, Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. hebaibrahim79@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6892-3376

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionThere is significant potential for CRISPR/Cas9 to be used in developing crops that can adapt to biotic stresses such as fungal, bacterial, viral, and pest infections and weeds. The increasing global population and climate change present significant threats to food security by putting stress on plants, making them more vulnerable to diseases and productivity losses caused by pathogens, pests, and weeds. Traditional breeding methods are inadequate for the rapid development of new plant traits needed to counteract this decline in productivity. However, modern advances in genome-editing technologies, particularly CRISPR/Cas9, have transformed crop protection through precise and targeted modifications of plant genomes. This enables the creation of resilient crops with improved resistance to pathogens, pests, and weeds. This review examines various methods by which CRISPR/Cas9 can be utilized for crop protection. These methods include knocking out susceptibility genes, introducing resistance genes, and modulating defense genes. Potential applications of CRISPR/Cas9 in crop protection involve introducing genes that confer resistance to pathogens, disrupting insect genes responsible for survival and reproduction, and engineering crops that are resistant to herbicides. In conclusion, CRISPR/Cas9 holds great promise for advancing crop protection and ensuring food security in the face of environmental challenges and increasing population pressures. The most recent advancements in CRISPR technology for creating resistance to bacteria, fungi, viruses, and pests are covered here. We wrap up by outlining the most pressing issues and technological shortcomings, as well as unanswered questions for further study.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsCrops, AgriculturalStress, PhysiologicalDisease ResistanceGene EditingGenetic EngineeringPlant DiseasesPlants, Genetically ModifiedCRISPR/Cas9Crop immunityDisease resistanceGenome editingOmics integrationSustainable agriculture

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.