ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2025
Vision transformer and complex network analysis for autism spectrum disorder classification in T1 structural MRI.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutism spectrum disorder (ASD) affects social interaction, communication, and behavior. Early diagnosis is important as it enables timely intervention that can significantly improve long-term outcomes, but current diagnostic, which rely heavily on behavioral observations and clinical interviews, are often subjective and time-consuming. This study introduces an AI-based approach that uses T1-weighted structural MRI (sMRI) scans, network analysis, and vision transformers to automatically diagnose ASD.
methodssMRI data from 79 ASD patients and 105 healthy controls were obtained from the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange (ABIDE) database. Complex network analysis (CNA) features and ViT (Vision Transformer) features were developed for predicting ASD. Five models were developed for each type of features: logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), gradient boosting (GB), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and neural network (NN). 25 models were further developed by federating the two sets of 5 models. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), sensitivity, and specificity via fivefold cross-validation.
resultsThe federate model CNA(KNN)-ViT(NN) achieved highest performance, with accuracy 0.951 ± 0.067, AUC-ROC 0.980 ± 0.020, sensitivity 0.963 ± 0.050, and specificity 0.943 ± 0.047. The performance of the ViT-based models exceeds that of the complex network-based models on 80% of the performance metrics. By federating CNA models, the ViT models can achieve better performance.
conclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility of using CNA and ViT models for the automated diagnosis of ASD. The proposed CNA(KNN)-ViT(NN) model achieved better accuracy in ASD classification based solely on T1 sMRI images. The proposed method's reliance on widely available T1 sMRI scans highlights its potential for integration into routine clinical examinations, facilitating more efficient and accessible ASD screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40663220What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.