Trial reportStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2026
Accelerated vs. conventionally fractionated postoperative radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer-final results of the prematurely terminated PORTAF trial.
Trial report in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02189967 (Postoperative Radiotherapy of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Postoperative Radiotherapy of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Accelerated vs. Conventional Fractionation
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA prolonged overall treatment time (OTT) has been demonstrated to adversely affect the primary radiation therapy (RT) outcome in various solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Retrospective data from our group suggested an advantage of shorter OTT also for postoperative RT (PORT) in patients with NSCLC. The PORTAF trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02189967) was initiated to prospectively test this hypothesis.
methodsThe multicenter prospective randomized phase II trial in patients with NSCLC investigated whether an accelerated schedule of PORT (7 fractions per week, 2 Gy per fraction, OTT 3.5-4 weeks) improved outcome compared to conventional fractionation (5 fractions per week, 2 Gy per fraction, OTT 5-6 weeks). Target volumes and total radiation doses were stratified in both treatment arms based on individual risk factors. Primary endpoint of the study was locoregional tumor control (LRTC) 36 months after PORT, with 154 patients to be included in each arm.
resultsDue to slow accrual and changed indications for PORT, we prematurely closed the trial in 2019. Between 2014 and 2019, eight recruiting centers included 27 evaluable patients. An interim safety analysis performed for the first 21 patients showed nonsignificant differences regarding grade 3 toxicities between the treatment arms, thus not meeting the termination criteria. LRTC was not significantly different between accelerated (73%) and conventionally fractionated RT (92%; p = 0.535). Noteworthily, in 21 FDG-PET/CT restagings before RT, an unexpectedly high number of locoregional recurrences (n = 4) and distant metastases (n = 2) were seen, resulting in changed treatment intentions for these patients.
conclusionThe prematurely closed PORTAF trial did not find significant differences in 3‑year LRTC when comparing accelerated versus conventionally fractionated irradiation. The observed additional benefit of FDG-PET/CT restaging prior to PORT should be further investigated in a larger cohort to optimize patient selection and avoid unnecessary side-effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.