ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
A question of rate? Girl-women differences in motor unit firing rate.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate age-related differences in motor unit (MU) activation patterns in females during submaximal knee extensions.
methodsFourteen young women (22.1 ± 1.5 yrs) and 10 girls (9.8 ± 0.8 yrs) participated in the study. Following the determination of maximal strength (MVC), participants completed trapezoidal isometric contractions to 70%MVC and sEMG was recorded from the vastus lateralis. sEMG signals were decomposed, and MU firing rate (MUFR) and recruitment threshold (RT) were calculated. Group differences in MU activation patterns were assessed using multilevel modelling.
resultsGirls' MVC was significantly lower than young women's, even after accounting for body size (2.0 ± 0.4 and 2.6 ± 0.8 Nm/body mass, respectively). The y-intercept of the MUFR-RT relationship was significantly lower in girls compared with the young women (estimate = 4.38pps; p < 0.05). There were no group differences in the MUFR-RT slope, reflecting lower MUFR in girls among low and high-threshold MUs. Lastly, the highest RT at which MUs were identified was significantly (p = 0.04) lower in girls (53.4 ± 7.2%MVC) compared with young women (60.5 ± 8.2%MVC). Overall, girls had lower MUFR and recruited their MUs over a smaller range of RTs compared with women.
conclusionsTogether, these results suggest that girls and young women utilize different MU activation schemes when performing high-intensity knee extensions. Specifically, compared with women, girls may have to recruit more MUs over a narrower recruitment range due to their lower MUFRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40663143What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.